Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
91
Highlights
38
Differences
3
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 321 MagGo
vs
Anker 622 MagGo:
91 Highlights & 38 Differences —
So, Which Power Bank Actually Works Better
Looking for a budget-friendly power bank? Learn the strengths of both the latest Anker 321 and the older but solid Anker 622 models.
Trying to decide between Anker 321 MagGo and Anker 622 MagGo? This side-by-side comparison covers the maximum input power, pass-through charging, charging time & output port type and extras that actually matter in a power banks.
Supports Wearable Device
Indicates compatibility with smartwatches and wearables.
with a difference of 90 points
Backward Compatible
Ensures support for older devices and standards.
with a difference of 90 points
Physical Dimensions & Weight
0.09 inch slimmer depth
Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank.
0.5 inch
vs
0.59 inch
Pocket-Friendly Design
Indicates whether the size is suitable for pocket carry.
with a difference of 90 points
Travel-Friendly Size
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
with a difference of 90 points
Build Materials & Durability
Button Durability Rated Good
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
with 59 points higher
Uses Fire Retardant Material
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
with a difference of 90 points
Heat Resistant
Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation.
with a difference of 90 points
Has 1 Thermal Sensors
Specifies how many thermal sensors are used for temperature monitoring.
with 19 points higher
Supports Thermal Throttling
Reduces power output automatically to prevent overheating.
with a difference of 90 points
Cooling Design Type: Passive Cooling
Describes the overall cooling architecture used to manage internal heat during charging and discharging.
with 59 points higher
Supports Wearable Device
Indicates compatibility with smartwatches and wearables.
with a difference of 90 points
Backward Compatible
Ensures support for older devices and standards.
with a difference of 90 points
Physical Dimensions & Weight
0.09 inch slimmer depth
Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank.
0.5 inch
vs
0.59 inch
Pocket-Friendly Design
Indicates whether the size is suitable for pocket carry.
with a difference of 90 points
Travel-Friendly Size
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
with a difference of 90 points
Build Materials & Durability
Button Durability Rated Good
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
with 59 points higher
Uses Fire Retardant Material
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
with a difference of 90 points
Heat Resistant
Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation.
with a difference of 90 points
Has 1 Thermal Sensors
Specifies how many thermal sensors are used for temperature monitoring.
with 19 points higher
Supports Thermal Throttling
Reduces power output automatically to prevent overheating.
with a difference of 90 points
Cooling Design Type: Passive Cooling
Describes the overall cooling architecture used to manage internal heat during charging and discharging.
with 59 points higher
Anker 321 MagGo vs Anker 622 MagGo: Side-by-Side Power Bank Showdown
When comparing the Anker 321 MagGo and the Anker 622 MagGo, both power banks cater to smartphone and travel backup needs with 5000mAh battery capacities and MagSafe compatibility. Each promises dependable charging on the go, leveraging lightweight, pocket-friendly designs and modern lithium-polymer battery technology. However, these devices differ in a few critical areas, such as release year, port count, input charging power, and advanced feature sets like thermal safety and power management.
Both models deliver a total output power of 12W, utilize USB-C input ports for recharging, and include pass-through charging functionality; abilities crucial for seamless, efficient device powering. However, the 321 MagGo boasts dual output ports versus the 622's single USB-C port, reflecting a fundamental difference in simultaneous device charging capability. While the 622 MagGo offers a higher maximum input power rating of 15W, its 321 sibling settles at 10W but compensates with better overall safety certifications, thermal cutoff thresholds, and smart power enhancements rooted in its more recent 2023 release.
What Makes the Anker 321 MagGo Stand Out?
The Anker 321 MagGo emphasizes versatility and safety. Packed into a compact frame measuring just 2.5" x 3.7" x 0.59" and weighing only 0.284 pounds, it is arguably more travel-friendly than the 622. The dual USB-C output ports allow charging two devices simultaneously with stable, well-regulated power delivery; ideal for charging both a smartphone and earbuds simultaneously. Its smart power management system and power distribution control ensure optimal energy allocation per connected device.
The 321 MagGo also boasts enhanced safety features highlighted by UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS certifications, comprehensive thermal protection up to a higher thermal cutoff threshold of 140°F, and multiple safeguards, including overcharge, overdischarge, short circuit, surge protection, and foreign object detection. These features, combined with passive cooling and automatic power optimization, contribute to sustained charging performance and device safety.
Besides rugged durability supported by fire-retardant materials and scratch-resistant textured finish, the Anker 321 MagGo offers user convenience through an LED battery level indicator with 25% accuracy and an auto wake/sleep feature enhancing power efficiency. Moreover, the included USB-C charging cable and extended 18-month warranty offer excellent value for the price of $25.99 at Anker.com.
Why Consider the Anker 622 MagGo?
Launched in 2021, the Anker 622 MagGo remains a dependable option for those who prioritize input charging speed and personalized aesthetics. Clocking a maximum input power of 15W, this slightly heavier and taller power bank (0.31 lbs, 4.13" height) can recharge faster, an advantage for users who need quick turnaround times to top off the battery.
Its single USB-C output port pairs with a moderate output current rating of 2.4A and includes an auto shut-off feature to prevent battery drain when idle. The 622 MagGo also supports a wider array of color options, such as Interstellar Gray, Misty Blue, and Lilac Purple, giving users room for personal style preferences unavailable in the 321's single black finish.
While lacking some of the newer smart power management and foreign object detection features of the 321, the 622 still covers basic protections like thermal management, surge protection, and failsafe shutdown. Its thermal cutoff threshold is lower at 118°F, which could imply more conservative heat handling. Users should note its longer charging time of about 3 hours compared to the 321's 2 hours due to input power differences.
Despite that, the 622 MagGo offers a reassuring 24-month warranty and reliable LED battery level indicators to keep track of charge status. Its 1.97-foot charging cable and matte plastic finish round out the package, standing as a solid albeit slightly dated companion for travel or daily phone boosts.
Quick Take
The Anker 321 MagGo wins on versatility with its dual output ports, solid safety certifications, and smarter power management suited for modern device charging needs. Meanwhile, the Anker 622 MagGo appeals to users seeking a faster recharge rate and more stylized color options, albeit at the cost of fewer output ports and a heavier design.
Bottom Line
For most users, the Anker 321 MagGo emerges as the better all-around choice thanks to its balanced feature set, newer technology, and lightweight size. However, if rapid input charging and personalized colors top your priority list, the older yet capable Anker 622 MagGo remains a worthy contender.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 321 MagGo - Delivers dual-port convenience, enhanced safety features, and efficient thermal management in a compact, travel-friendly package at an affordable price.
Runner-up: Anker 622 MagGo - Offers faster recharge input and color variety, but with limited output ports and slightly bulkier dimensions.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Trying to choose between Anker 321 MagGo and Anker 622 MagGo? This comparison includes everything — specs, pros and cons, and what users noticed most.
Anker 321 MagGo was released in 2023, making it a newer model compared to the Anker 622 MagGo which was released in 2021. Users looking for the latest product might prefer the Anker 321 MagGo.
Indicates the year the product was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
28 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Release Year,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The Intended Use Case for Anker 321 MagGo includes Smartphone, Tablet Charging, and Travel Backup, while Anker 622 MagGo focuses on Smartphone Charging and Travel Backup. Anker 321 MagGo offers broader compatibility for tablet users.
Describes the primary usage scenarios the power bank is designed for.
In the battle of Intended Use Case,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use Case on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 321 MagGo is only available in Black, whereas Anker 622 MagGo offers multiple color options including Interstellar Gray, Misty Blue, Dolomite White, Buds Green, and Lilac Purple. Anker 622 MagGo provides more aesthetic choices for personalization.
Lists the available exterior color choices.
In the battle of Color Options,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Finish Type
What type of finish does it have?
62
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Textured
79
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Matte
vs
Finish Type
The Finish Type of Anker 321 MagGo is Textured, offering a distinct feel compared to the Matte finish of Anker 622 MagGo. The choice depends on personal preference for grip and appearance.
Describes the surface finish of the exterior shell.
In the battle of Finish Type,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish Type on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Minimum
What is the minimum operating temperature?
32
°F
0Votes
32
°F
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
The power bank can operate safely in environments with temperatures as low as 32°F (0°C).
Defines the lowest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Minimum,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
equal
32.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Minimum on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Maximum
What is the maximum operating temperature?
104
°F
0Votes
104
°F
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
The power bank can operate safely in environments with temperatures up to 104°F (40°C). Using it above this limit may affect performance or safety.
Defines the highest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Maximum,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
equal
104.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Maximum on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
57
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Power Bank
39
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Power Bank
Identifies the functional category of the portable charging device.
In the battle of Product Type,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
Where is this product made?
67
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
China
59
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
China
States the country where the product is manufactured or assembled.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Rugged Design
Does it have a rugged design?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates whether the power bank is built for enhanced durability.
In the battle of Rugged Design,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rugged Design on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Waterproof Rating
What is the waterproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Shows the level of water resistance certification.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Waterproof Rating on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Dustproof Rating
What is the dustproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates protection against dust ingress.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dustproof Rating on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
67
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
-4-113°F
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Storage Temperature Range
Anker 321 MagGo specifies a Storage Temperature Range of -4-113°F, while this information is unavailable for Anker 622 MagGo. Users with specific storage requirements may appreciate the explicit detail provided for Anker 321 MagGo.
Specifies safe temperature conditions for storing the power bank when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates how much charge is lost when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Self-Discharge Rate on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Overcharge Protection
Is overcharge protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 321 MagGo
This feature prevents the battery from being overcharged, extending its lifespan and ensuring safety.
Anker 622 MagGo
The device is equipped with overcharge protection, preventing the battery from being charged beyond its safe capacity, which helps prolong its lifespan and maintain safety.
Prevents damage from charging beyond safe limits.
In the battle of Overcharge Protection,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcharge Protection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Voltage
What is the battery voltage?
3.7
Volt
0Votes
3.85
Volt
0Votes
vs
Battery Voltage
Anker 321 MagGo operates at a Battery Voltage of 3.7 Volt, which is slightly lower than Anker 622 MagGo's 3.85 Volt. This difference may influence the power delivery characteristics.
Indicates the nominal voltage of the battery pack.
In the battle of Battery Voltage,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Voltage on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Cell Type
What type of battery cell does it use?
67
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Pouch
69
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Pouch
Indicates the physical form factor of the battery cells used.
In the battle of Battery Cell Type,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Cell Type on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Chemistry
What battery chemistry is used?
47
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
59
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
Defines the chemical composition of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Chemistry,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Chemistry on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Capacity
What is the rated capacity?
5,000
mAh
0Votes
5
mAh
0Votes
vs
Rated Capacity
Anker 321 MagGo has a Rated Capacity of 5000 mAh, significantly higher than Anker 622 MagGo's 5 mAh. The Anker 321 MagGo offers substantially more usable power for devices.
Indicates the usable output capacity after conversion losses.
In the battle of Rated Capacity,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
4,995.0 mAh
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Capacity on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Rating
What is the energy rating?
18.5
Watt
0Votes
19.25
Watt
0Votes
vs
Energy Rating
The Energy Rating for Anker 321 MagGo is 18.5 Watt, slightly less than Anker 622 MagGo's 19.25 Watt. Anker 622 MagGo has a marginally higher energy storage.
Measures total energy stored expressed in watt-hours.
In the battle of Energy Rating,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
0.8 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Rating on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Cell Count
How many battery cells are used?
7
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
1
29
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
1
Shows the number of battery cells inside the power bank.
In the battle of Cell Count,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cell Count on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Configuration
What is the battery configuration?
17
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Single Cell
9
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Single Cell
Describes how battery cells are electrically arranged to achieve desired voltage and capacity.
In the battle of Battery Configuration,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Configuration on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Cycle Life Rating
What is the cycle life rating?
47
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
300–500 Cycles
29
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
300–500 Cycles
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
In the battle of Cycle Life Rating,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cycle Life Rating on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Loss
How much power is lost in standby?
0.1
Watt
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Standby Power Loss
Anker 321 MagGo has a Standby Power Loss of 0.1 Watt, but this information is not available for Anker 622 MagGo. The Anker 321 MagGo provides transparency on its minimal power consumption when idle.
Measures power lost while the unit is idle.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Loss on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Protection System
Does it include a battery protection system?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Confirms presence of integrated battery protection circuitry.
In the battle of Battery Protection System,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Protection System on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Overdischarge Protection
Is overdischarge protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Prevents battery depletion below safe voltage levels.
In the battle of Overdischarge Protection,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overdischarge Protection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 321 MagGo supports a Maximum Input Power of 10 Watt, which is lower than Anker 622 MagGo's 15 Watt. Anker 622 MagGo can recharge itself faster due to higher input power.
Shows the maximum power the power bank can accept while charging.
In the battle of Maximum Input Power,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
5.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Input Power on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
The power bank supports pass-through charging, meaning it can charge itself and a connected device simultaneously, providing convenience.
Allows the power bank to charge devices while being charged itself.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Two hours versus three hours? The Anker 321 is a clear winner here. I need my power bank charged up quick!
See more
USB-C Input
Is USB-C input supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 321 MagGo
The power bank features a USB-C input port, allowing for modern and reversible connectivity for charging the power bank itself.
Confirms whether USB-C can be used as a charging input.
In the battle of USB-C Input,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-C Input on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Input Port Type
What input port types are supported?
97
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
USB-C
89
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
USB-C
Identifies the physical port types used to recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Input Port Type,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Type on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Input Port Count
How many input ports does it have?
7
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
1
19
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
1
Indicates how many input ports are available for charging.
In the battle of Input Port Count,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Count on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage Range
What input voltage range is supported?
16
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
5V
9
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
5V
Specifies the supported voltage range for charging input.
In the battle of Input Voltage Range,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage Range on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current Rating
What is the input current rating?
2
Amp
0Votes
3
Amp
0Votes
vs
Input Current Rating
The Input Current Rating for Anker 321 MagGo is 2 Amp, whereas Anker 622 MagGo has a higher rating of 3 Amp. Anker 622 MagGo allows for quicker charging of the power bank itself.
Defines the maximum current the power bank can draw during charging.
In the battle of Input Current Rating,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 Amp
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current Rating on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Input Charging
Does it support fast input charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates whether fast-charging input standards are supported.
In the battle of Fast Input Charging,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Input Charging on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Efficiency
What is the charging efficiency?
70
%
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Charging Efficiency
Anker 321 MagGo reports a Charging Efficiency of 70%, but this data is unavailable for Anker 622 MagGo. For users prioritizing known energy efficiency, Anker 321 MagGo offers this specific detail.
Measures how efficiently input power is converted to stored energy.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Efficiency on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
The device delivers a maximum output power of 12 Watt, suitable for fast charging compatible smartphones and small devices.
Anker 622 MagGo
The power bank can deliver a maximum output power of 12 Watt, suitable for fast charging compatible smartphones and small devices.
Shows the highest power level supported by a single output.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
equal
12.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Output Power on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 321 MagGo provides Good Voltage Regulation Accuracy, which is superior to Anker 622 MagGo's Average rating. Anker 321 MagGo offers more precise and reliable voltage output.
Indicates how precisely the power bank maintains target voltage levels during charging.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation Accuracy,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation Accuracy on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 321 MagGo has an Output Current Rating of 12 Watt, significantly higher than Anker 622 MagGo's 2.4 Watt. Anker 321 MagGo can deliver more power to connected devices.
Represents the power delivery capability under load conditions.
In the battle of Output Current Rating,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
9.6 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current Rating on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Output Port Count
How many output ports does it have?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
1Votes
2
19
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
1
vs
Output Port Count
Anker 321 MagGo features 2 Output Ports, allowing it to charge more devices simultaneously compared to Anker 622 MagGo which has 1. For users needing to charge multiple devices at once, Anker 321 MagGo is more versatile.
Indicates how many devices can be physically connected at once.
In the battle of Output Port Count,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Output Port Count,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Having two output ports on the 321 MagGo is a huge plus for me. I often need to charge my phone and earbuds at the same time.
See more
Output Voltage Range
What output voltage range is supported?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
5V
19
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
5V
Anker 622 MagGo
The device provides a stable output voltage of 5V, which is compatible with most USB-powered electronics.
Defines the voltage levels supported for device charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage Range,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage Range on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
Can it charge multiple devices simultaneously?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
Anker 321 MagGo supports Simultaneous Device Charging, a feature not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. If charging multiple devices concurrently is important, Anker 321 MagGo explicitly offers this capability.
Indicates whether multiple devices can be charged at once.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Charging Technology
Which fast charging technologies are supported?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Lists supported fast-charging standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Charging Technology on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Control
Does it manage power distribution automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Power Distribution Control
Anker 321 MagGo includes Power Distribution Control, a feature that is not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This suggests Anker 321 MagGo might manage power output more intelligently across multiple devices.
Ensures balanced power delivery across connected devices.
In the battle of Power Distribution Control,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Control on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Output Stability
How stable is the output power?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Stable
39
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Moderate
vs
Output Stability
The Output Stability of Anker 321 MagGo is rated as Stable, whereas Anker 622 MagGo is rated as Moderate. Anker 321 MagGo offers more consistent power delivery.
Describes how consistently the power bank maintains output power under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Output Stability,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Stability on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Load Detection
Does it detect connected device load?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Load Detection
Anker 321 MagGo is equipped with Load Detection, a feature for which information is unavailable for Anker 622 MagGo. This allows Anker 321 MagGo to automatically adjust output based on the connected device.
Automatically detects connected devices to optimize power output.
In the battle of Load Detection,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Detection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Power Device Mode
Is there a low-power device mode?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Enables safe charging for small electronics like earbuds.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Power Device Mode on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it auto shut off when idle?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Auto Shut-Off
Anker 622 MagGo features Auto Shut-Off, which is not specified for Anker 321 MagGo. Users seeking energy-saving features may prefer Anker 622 MagGo.
Automatically stops output when no device is connected.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates support for Programmable Power Supply charging.
In the battle of Programmable Power Supply,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Power Supply on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 321 MagGo
The power bank is compatible with Apple devices, providing efficient and safe charging for iPhones, iPads, and other Apple gadgets.
Ensures optimized charging for Apple devices.
In the battle of Apple Charging Compatibility,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging Compatibility on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery fast charging standard.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Is Quick Charge supported?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Confirms compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge standards.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Samsung Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Samsung devices?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Confirms optimized charging for Samsung devices.
In the battle of Samsung Charging Compatibility,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Samsung Charging Compatibility on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates ability to charge laptops via USB-C output.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging
Can it charge tablets?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Tablet Charging
Anker 321 MagGo supports Tablet Charging, a feature not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. Tablet users will find the Anker 321 MagGo more suitable for their charging needs.
Confirms reliable charging for tablets and large devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Device
Does it support wearable devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates compatibility with smartwatches and wearables.
In the battle of Wearable Device,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Device on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Current Device
Does it support low-current devices?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Low-Current Device
Anker 622 MagGo supports Low-Current Device charging, while this feature is not specified for Anker 321 MagGo. Users who frequently charge small devices like earbuds or smartwatches might prefer the Anker 622 MagGo.
Enables safe charging for devices requiring very low current.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Current Device on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Protocol on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Protocol Auto-Detection
Does it auto-detect charging protocols?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Automatically selects the best protocol for each device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protocol Auto-Detection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
This power bank is designed with a compact form factor, making it convenient to carry in a pocket or small bag for on-the-go charging.
Anker 622 MagGo
The design prioritizes portability, making the power bank compact enough to fit comfortably in a pocket or small bag.
Indicates whether the size is suitable for pocket carry.
In the battle of Pocket-Friendly Design,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pocket-Friendly Design on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 321 MagGo weighs 0.284 lbs (approximately 128.8 grams), making it slightly lighter than Anker 622 MagGo's 0.31 lbs (approximately 140.6 grams). The Anker 321 MagGo is a more lightweight option for portability.
Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability.
In the battle of Weight,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
equal
0.28 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 321 MagGo has a Width of 2.5 inches (6.35 cm), making it slightly narrower than Anker 622 MagGo's 2.62 inches (6.65 cm). The Anker 321 MagGo is marginally more compact.
Measures the horizontal size of the power bank.
In the battle of Width,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
0.59
inch
0Votes
0.5
inch
0Votes
vs
Depth
The Depth of Anker 321 MagGo is 0.59 inches (1.5 cm), which is slightly thicker than Anker 622 MagGo's 0.5 inches (1.27 cm). Anker 622 MagGo offers a slimmer profile.
Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Travel-Friendly Size
Is it travel-friendly?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 321 MagGo
Its compact and lightweight design makes this power bank ideal for travel, fitting easily into luggage without adding significant bulk.
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
In the battle of Travel-Friendly Size,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel-Friendly Size on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the height?
3.7
inch
0Votes
4.13
inch
0Votes
vs
Height
Anker 321 MagGo measures 3.7 inches (9.4 cm) in Height, making it shorter than Anker 622 MagGo which is 4.13 inches (10.49 cm). Anker 321 MagGo offers a more compact vertical dimension.
Measures the vertical dimension of the power bank.
In the battle of Height,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
0.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
The power bank is constructed using fire-retardant materials, adding an extra layer of safety to prevent potential fire hazards.
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
In the battle of Fire Retardant Materials,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Retardant Materials on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation.
In the battle of Heat Resistance,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Outer Shell Material
What is the outer shell material?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Plastic
39
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Plastic
Anker 622 MagGo
The outer shell of the device is made from Plastic, which contributes to its lightweight design and durability.
Specifies the primary material used for the exterior housing.
In the battle of Outer Shell Material,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Outer Shell Material on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Button Durability Rating
How durable are the buttons?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Good
59
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Good
Anker 321 MagGo
The buttons on this device have a Good durability rating, indicating they are designed to withstand frequent use.
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
In the battle of Button Durability Rating,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
59 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Durability Rating on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Frame Material
What is the internal frame material?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Plastic
29
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Plastic
Describes the internal structural material supporting the battery cells.
In the battle of Internal Frame Material,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Frame Material on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Impact Resistance Rating
What is the impact resistance rating?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Low Impact Resistance
0
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Low Impact Resistance
Indicates the ability of the power bank to withstand shocks and physical impacts.
In the battle of Impact Resistance Rating,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Impact Resistance Rating on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance Height
What drop height can it survive?
1
ft
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Drop Resistance Height
Anker 321 MagGo specifies a Drop Resistance Height of 1 foot (0.3 meters), while this information is unavailable for Anker 622 MagGo. For users concerned about durability, Anker 321 MagGo provides a quantifiable metric.
Specifies the maximum drop height the device can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance Height on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance
Is the surface scratch resistant?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Scratch Resistance
Anker 321 MagGo is stated to have Scratch Resistance, a feature not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. The Anker 321 MagGo may offer better protection against cosmetic damage.
Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
48 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Structural Reinforcement
Is there structural reinforcement?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates added reinforcement for improved durability.
In the battle of Structural Reinforcement,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Structural Reinforcement on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Port Reinforcement
Anker 321 MagGo features Port Reinforcement, which is not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This suggests the Anker 321 MagGo may offer enhanced durability around its charging ports.
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
The device uses an LED Light to provide user feedback and alerts, such as battery status or charging indicators, clearly and intuitively.
Indicates how the device provides user feedback and alerts.
In the battle of User Feedback Alerts,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Alerts on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Indicator Accuracy
Anker 321 MagGo provides an Indicator Accuracy of 25% for its battery level display, a detail not available for Anker 622 MagGo. This provides users of Anker 321 MagGo with a clearer expectation of battery reporting.
Measures how accurately the indicator reflects actual remaining power.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Accuracy on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates whether touch-based controls are supported.
In the battle of Touch Control,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch Control on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Button Count
How many buttons are there?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
1
99
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
1
Anker 321 MagGo
The device features a single, easy-to-use 1 button for basic controls, enhancing its minimalist design.
Anker 622 MagGo
The device is equipped with a single 1 button, simplifying user interaction and control.
Indicates the number of physical control buttons.
In the battle of Button Count,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
99 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Count on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Button Type
What type of button does it use?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Physical Button
39
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Physical Button
Anker 622 MagGo
The device uses a Physical Button for user interaction, offering tactile feedback for reliable operation.
Describes the type of button used for control.
In the battle of Button Type,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Type on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Sleep Feature
Does it auto sleep when idle?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Auto Sleep Feature
Anker 321 MagGo is equipped with an Auto Sleep Feature, a detail unavailable for Anker 622 MagGo. This can help conserve battery life in the Anker 321 MagGo by automatically entering a low-power state.
Automatically enters sleep mode when idle to save power.
In the battle of Auto Sleep Feature,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Sleep Feature on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Display Type
What type of display does it have?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
LED Indicator
29
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
LED Indicator
Specifies the type of display used to show power information.
In the battle of Display Type,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Display Type on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Level Indicator
Does it show battery level?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates whether the power bank shows remaining battery level.
In the battle of Battery Level Indicator,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Level Indicator on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Remaining Time Display
Does it display remaining time?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Shows estimated remaining usage or charging time.
In the battle of Remaining Time Display,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remaining Time Display on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Wake Feature
Does it auto wake when a device is connected?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Auto Wake Feature
Anker 321 MagGo includes an Auto Wake Feature, which is not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This can offer greater convenience for Anker 321 MagGo users when starting charging.
Automatically activates when a device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Wake Feature,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Wake Feature on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
The device incorporates short circuit protection, safeguarding both the power bank and connected devices from damage in case of a short circuit.
Prevents damage when a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature monitoring capabilities are integrated, allowing the device to constantly check its internal temperature for safe and optimized operation.
Continuously monitors internal temperature.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 321 MagGo includes Electrostatic Discharge Protection, which is not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This feature helps protect Anker 321 MagGo from damage due to static electricity.
Protects internal circuits from static electricity.
In the battle of Electrostatic Discharge Protection,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrostatic Discharge Protection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
The Safety Certification for Anker 321 MagGo includes UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS, while Anker 622 MagGo is certified with FCC, RoHS, and CE. Anker 321 MagGo carries an additional UL certification, potentially indicating a higher standard of safety.
Lists recognized safety and compliance certifications.
In the battle of Safety Certification,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
79 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Automatically shuts down under critical fault conditions.
In the battle of Fail-Safe Shutdown,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fail-Safe Shutdown on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection
Is surge protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 321 MagGo
Integrated surge protection safeguards connected devices from sudden voltage spikes, ensuring a stable and secure charging experience.
Protects against sudden power surges.
In the battle of Surge Protection,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection Circuit
Does it include fire protection circuitry?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 321 MagGo
An integrated fire protection circuit enhances safety by minimizing the risk of fire hazards under abnormal conditions.
Includes circuitry designed to prevent fire hazards.
In the battle of Fire Protection Circuit,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection Circuit on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Power Management
Does it use smart power management?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Smart Power Management
Anker 321 MagGo offers Smart Power Management, a feature not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This implies Anker 321 MagGo has more advanced internal systems for optimizing power delivery.
Dynamically manages power to maintain safe operation.
In the battle of Smart Power Management,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Management on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Protects devices from excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it include overvoltage protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Prevents voltage levels from exceeding safe limits.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Foreign Object Detection
Does it detect foreign objects?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Foreign Object Detection
Anker 321 MagGo has Foreign Object Detection, a safety feature not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This adds an extra layer of safety for Anker 321 MagGo by preventing charging when foreign objects are present.
Detects abnormal objects or unsafe connections.
In the battle of Foreign Object Detection,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foreign Object Detection on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Airline Safety Compliance
Is it airline-safe?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates compliance with airline carry-on regulations.
In the battle of Airline Safety Compliance,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Airline Safety Compliance on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Firmware
Is safety firmware implemented?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Uses firmware logic to manage and enforce safety rules.
In the battle of Safety Firmware,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Firmware on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
An integrated thermal management system is present to help regulate the device's temperature during operation, enhancing safety and performance.
Indicates whether the power bank includes an integrated thermal management system.
In the battle of Thermal Management System,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Management System on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 321 MagGo has a Thermal Cutoff Threshold of 140°F (60°C), which is higher than Anker 622 MagGo's 118°F (47.8°C). Anker 321 MagGo allows for a higher operating temperature before engaging safety shutdowns.
Indicates the temperature at which the system shuts down to prevent damage.
In the battle of Thermal Cutoff Threshold,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
22.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Cutoff Threshold on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Recovery Behavior
How does it recover from overheating?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Automatic Resume
49
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Cooldown Required
vs
Overheat Recovery Behavior
The Overheat Recovery Behavior for Anker 321 MagGo is Automatic Resume, whereas Anker 622 MagGo requires a Cooldown. Anker 321 MagGo offers more convenient recovery after an overheat event.
Defines how the system recovers after an overheat shutdown.
In the battle of Overheat Recovery Behavior,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
49 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Recovery Behavior on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Passive Cooling
39
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Passive Cooling
Anker 622 MagGo
The device utilizes Passive Cooling for heat dissipation, relying on natural convection and radiation without the need for active components like fans.
Describes how heat is dispersed away from internal components.
In the battle of Heat Dissipation Method,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Dissipation Method on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling
Does it support thermal throttling?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 321 MagGo
The device incorporates thermal throttling, which automatically reduces power output to prevent overheating and maintain optimal operating temperatures during heavy use.
Reduces power output automatically to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Heat Sink
Is there an internal heat sink?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates the presence of an internal heat sink to absorb and spread heat.
In the battle of Internal Heat Sink,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Heat Sink on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Sensor Count
How many thermal sensors are used?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
1
19
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
1
Specifies how many thermal sensors are used for temperature monitoring.
In the battle of Thermal Sensor Count,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Sensor Count on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Design Type
What cooling design type is used?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Passive Cooling
59
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Passive Cooling
Describes the overall cooling architecture used to manage internal heat during charging and discharging.
In the battle of Cooling Design Type,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
59 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Design Type on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Temperature Control
Is surface temperature controlled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Surface Temperature Control
Anker 321 MagGo features Surface Temperature Control, which is not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This indicates Anker 321 MagGo actively manages its external temperature for user comfort and safety.
Limits external surface temperature for safe handling.
In the battle of Surface Temperature Control,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Temperature Control on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Spread Layer
Is there a heat spread layer?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates the use of internal layers to evenly distribute heat.
In the battle of Heat Spread Layer,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Spread Layer on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Temperature Regulation
Is charging temperature regulated?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Actively manages temperature during charging cycles.
In the battle of Charging Temperature Regulation,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Temperature Regulation on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Discharge Temperature Regulation
Is discharge temperature regulated?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Discharge Temperature Regulation
Anker 321 MagGo includes Discharge Temperature Regulation, a feature not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This helps maintain optimal temperature during power discharge for the Anker 321 MagGo.
Controls temperature while powering external devices.
In the battle of Discharge Temperature Regulation,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Discharge Temperature Regulation on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Sends alerts for battery status, faults, or charging completion.
In the battle of Smart Alerts,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Alerts on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Connectivity
Does it support Bluetooth connectivity?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates whether the power bank can connect wirelessly to other devices.
In the battle of Bluetooth Connectivity,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Connectivity on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
App Support
Is there app support?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Confirms whether a companion mobile app is available.
In the battle of App Support,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App Support on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates whether firmware can be updated to improve functionality.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Power Monitoring
Does it offer smart power monitoring?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Provides real-time monitoring of power flow and usage.
In the battle of Smart Power Monitoring,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Monitoring on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Device Usage Analytics
Does it provide usage analytics?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Tracks connected device charging behavior and patterns.
In the battle of Device Usage Analytics,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Usage Analytics on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Charging History Tracking
Is charging history tracked?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Records past charging sessions for review.
In the battle of Charging History Tracking,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging History Tracking on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Status Monitoring
Can status be monitored remotely?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Allows users to check power bank status remotely.
In the battle of Remote Status Monitoring,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Status Monitoring on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental & Efficiency
7
Energy Conversion Efficiency
What is the energy conversion efficiency?
70
%
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Energy Conversion Efficiency
Anker 321 MagGo has an Energy Conversion Efficiency of 70%, while this specification is unavailable for Anker 622 MagGo. Anker 321 MagGo provides a clear metric for its power conversion performance.
Measures how efficiently stored energy is converted into usable output power.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Conversion Efficiency on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Power Consumption
How much power is used while idle?
0.1
Watt
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Idle Power Consumption
Anker 321 MagGo reports an Idle Power Consumption of 0.1 Watt, information not available for Anker 622 MagGo. Anker 321 MagGo offers transparency regarding its power usage when not actively charging.
Indicates how much power is consumed when the power bank is not actively charging devices.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Power Consumption on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode
Does it support eco mode?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Enables reduced power usage to improve efficiency and battery longevity.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Power Optimization
Does it optimize power automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Automatic Power Optimization
Anker 321 MagGo includes Automatic Power Optimization, a feature that is not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This suggests Anker 321 MagGo can intelligently manage power output for optimal charging.
Automatically adjusts output to reduce energy waste.
In the battle of Automatic Power Optimization,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Power Optimization on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Sustainable Materials
Does it use sustainable materials?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates use of environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Sustainable Materials,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustainable Materials on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Recycling Program
Is a recycling program supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Recycling Program
Anker 321 MagGo participates in a Recycling Program, which is not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. Environmentally conscious users might favor Anker 321 MagGo.
Indicates manufacturer support for recycling or take-back programs.
In the battle of Recycling Program,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recycling Program on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Certification
What environmental certifications does it have?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
RoHS
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Environmental Certification
Anker 321 MagGo has an Environmental Certification of RoHS, which is not specified for Anker 622 MagGo. This indicates Anker 321 MagGo complies with certain environmental standards for hazardous substances.
Lists recognized environmental or sustainability certifications.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Certification on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
The Charging Cable included with Anker 321 MagGo is 1 foot (30.48 cm) long, shorter than Anker 622 MagGo's 1.97 feet (60 cm) cable. Anker 622 MagGo provides a longer cable for more flexibility.
Specifies the length of the included charging cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
User Manual
Is a user manual included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 321 MagGo
A user manual is included to provide detailed instructions on product setup, usage, and troubleshooting.
Anker 622 MagGo
A user manual is provided with the product, offering comprehensive instructions for setup, usage, and troubleshooting.
Indicates whether a user manual or guide is provided.
In the battle of User Manual,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Manual on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Cable
Is a charging cable included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 622 MagGo
The product includes a charging cable, ensuring you have everything needed to power up the device right out of the box.
Indicates whether a charging cable is included in the box.
In the battle of Charging Cable,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Cable on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Carrying Case
Is a carrying case included?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates whether a protective carrying case is included.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Wall Adapter
Is a wall adapter included?
No
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates whether a wall charging adapter is provided.
In the battle of Wall Adapter,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wall Adapter on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Adapter Power Rating
What is the adapter power rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
12
Watt
0Votes
vs
Adapter Power Rating
Anker 622 MagGo specifies an Adapter Power Rating of 12 Watt, while this information is unavailable for Anker 321 MagGo. Users may get a sense of power compatibility from Anker 622 MagGo's rating.
Specifies the power output of the included wall adapter.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapter Power Rating on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
4
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Package Width
Anker 321 MagGo has a Package Width of 4 inches (10.16 cm), while this dimension is not available for Anker 622 MagGo. This provides an indication of the physical footprint of the Anker 321 MagGo's packaging.
Measures the width of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
3
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the depth of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
1
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the height of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Technical support is available for this product, offering expert assistance for any operational or technical inquiries.
Anker 622 MagGo
Technical support is available for this product, providing assistance for any queries or issues that may arise.
Confirms access to technical support services.
In the battle of Technical Support Availability,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Technical Support Availability on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 321 MagGo comes with a Warranty Length of 18 Months, which is shorter than Anker 622 MagGo's 24 Months. Anker 622 MagGo offers a longer period of coverage for peace of mind.
Indicates the duration of the manufacturer warranty.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
49 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Warranty Coverage
Is the battery covered by warranty?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 622 MagGo
The battery components are covered under warranty, providing assurance against defects specifically related to the battery's performance and longevity.
Indicates whether the battery itself is covered under warranty.
In the battle of Battery Warranty Coverage,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Warranty Coverage on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Repair Service Availability
Are repair services available?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Anker 321 MagGo
Repair services are available for the product, providing support and maintenance options if issues arise after purchase.
Confirms whether repair services are offered.
In the battle of Repair Service Availability,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Repair Service Availability on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels
What support channels are available?
0
Anker 321 MagGo
0Votes
Email, Phone, Live Chat
62
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Email, Phone, Live Chat
Lists available customer support contact methods.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
62 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
Is there a replacement policy?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Indicates eligibility for replacement in case of defects.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
Anker 321 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 622 MagGo ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Support Duration
How long is firmware support provided?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 321 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates how long the manufacturer provides firmware updates and software support.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Support Duration on Anker 321 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 622 MagGo ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed Performance
How fast does this power bank recharge devices in everyday use?
Ultra fast charging — Under 1.5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1.5 to 3 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate charging — 3 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 5 to 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Capacity Satisfaction
How satisfied are you with the battery capacity of this power bank for daily needs?
Massive capacity for multiple days — Over 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Very high capacity — 20000 to 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Solid everyday capacity — 10000 to 19999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Limited capacity — 5000 to 9999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Barely useful capacity — Under 5000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Output Power and Device Support
How well does this power bank handle charging different devices at once?
Handles everything with ease — 100 W or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong multi device support — 60 to 99 W
0Votes
0Votes
Good for phones and tablets — 30 to 59 W
0Votes
0Votes
Basic output only — 15 to 29 W
0Votes
0Votes
Struggles with most devices — Under 15 W
0Votes
0Votes
Port Selection and Flexibility
How flexible is this power bank when it comes to charging ports?
Covers all modern needs — USB C and USB A with fast charge
0Votes
0Votes
Very versatile — Multiple USB C and USB A ports
0Votes
0Votes
Good variety — USB C and USB A basic support
0Votes
0Votes
Limited options — Single USB C or USB A port
0Votes
0Votes
Very restrictive — One slow USB port only
0Votes
0Votes
Size and Portability
How easy is this power bank to carry around daily?
Pocket friendly and lightweight — Under 8 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Easy to carry — 8 to 12 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Manageable but noticeable — 12 to 18 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Bulky for daily carry — 18 to 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Too heavy to carry around — Over 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Build Quality and Durability
How durable does this power bank feel during regular use?
Feels extremely solid and long lasting — Over 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Very durable — 3 to 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Decent build quality — 2 to 3 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Feels fragile — 1 to 2 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap and unreliable — Under 1 year expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging output from this power bank during use?
Rock solid with no drops — Voltage variation under 3 percent
0Votes
0Votes
Very stable — 3 to 5 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Mostly stable — 5 to 8 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Occasional drops — 8 to 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Unstable charging — Over 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Heat and Safety Performance
How well does this power bank control heat during charging and heavy use?
Stays cool and safe — Under 95 F
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly warm but comfortable — 95 to 104 F
0Votes
0Votes
Warm but acceptable — 104 to 113 F
0Votes
0Votes
Gets quite hot — 113 to 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot and concerning — Over 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Efficiency
How efficiently does this power bank convert stored energy into usable charging power?
Highly efficient with minimal loss — Over 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Very efficient — 85 to 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Decent efficiency — 75 to 84 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeable energy loss — 65 to 74 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Poor efficiency — Under 65 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Travel Friendliness
How convenient is this power bank for travel and daily commuting?
Perfect for travel and flights — No airline issues
0Votes
0Votes
Very travel friendly — Easy to pack and carry
0Votes
0Votes
Fine for occasional travel — Manageable size and weight
0Votes
0Votes
Awkward to carry on trips — Bulky or heavy
0Votes
0Votes
Not suitable for travel — Restricted or impractical
0Votes
0Votes
Guides
2
Articles
1
Read The Anker 321 MagGo Battery 5K Power Bank Manual
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
